There's actually a word for that in Buddhism.
It's called "Chicken Meditation"
i googled it together with the word "buddhism" and found no match.
, because if meditation was simply sitting still for ages,
i said i swtich off trying to predict what they (the fish) will do next.
you presume that means i am sitting idly with nothing going through my head.
if i subtract "my prediction of how the fish will swim" from my sensorium, then i am not left with nothing else in my brain.
as far as i can see, your conclusions are always inherently derogatory in response to others ideas.
then all chickens would be fully enlightened ;-).
you equate my very simple sentence about watching fish with the level of mental development of a chicken.
i may be at the level of a chicken compared to you spiritually.
i never saw a chicken that was aware it was a chicken, and was dissatisfied with being a chicken.
a happy chicken is as happy as a happy human.
One of the things I realized quickly
about Buddhism, is I was doing so many things almost right, I'd put in an awful lot of right-effort honing my concentration and equanimity. Yet, it was all chicken-meditation, sitting peacefully, but not gaining the powerful insights into my own mind which such honing makes possible.
you seem precariously contradictory on occasions.
you said before that my mind "proliferates" and can never be still and see "the light".
now you are telling me my mind is too still, and that i should not just "blank out" (as you presume i do with no evidence that my mind is empty).
what ever i say you disagree with in a calm and unflustered way.
it is calm and unflustered because that is what buddhists "should" be. and that "wink" punctuation at the end of your sentences adds to my perception that you think you know it all.
it seems smug.
i think if i had a professional linguist (do they exist?) rewrite one of your long posts using alternative words, but the result being exactly the same in meaning to your post, and i posted it, you would disagree with it in the same default manner.
it means that you believe that i (and other people who you categorize as "not on the right track") are inevitably wrong, and you do not look for things you agree with in our opinions, but for faults for you to correct.
A lot of it is just knowing what direction to point the mind. If you let the mind be, it'll watch fish or whatever instead of looking inside and understanding itself :P.
when i watch fish i see fish and not an introspective image of myself.
i am not so self reflective that i must look at myself during everything i do.
i was once bailed up by a bald fellow hanging around outside a train station while i was waiting for a bus.
he had books and pamphlets and various paraphernalia pertinent to his "crusade"
he asked me what i thought about consciousness, and i decided to talk to him.
most people will sometimes subconsciously nod in agreement when they are listing to another person talking.
but right from my first word, he started to subconsciously and slowly shake his head.
my first words were "well i think consciousness is..." and he was already shaking his head.
i could tell he was not listening.
i could tell he felt that he had found the way, and all the commuters were poor lost sheep.
you may ask a sheep what it thinks, but you do not expect a valid answer, so you do not listen for one.
he interrupted me before i got to my point, and started imposing his ideas on me.
i started to disagree, and i could see there was a suppressed anger in him. (sighing, rubbing the back of his neck etc)
like he was wasting his time on a stupid person.
then the bus pulled up and i got on.
edit: corrected "stated" to "started"